I’ve always wondered if online addiction was a real disorder. The text in TLT made online compulsion and addiction seem less threatening than it is commonly believed to be, as it stated, “like cyberporn, the whole idea about ‘internet addition’ has been something of a moral panic.” The text also pointed out how the concept of Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) actually started as a joke by psychiatrist Ivan Goldberg in 1995. Since then, the idea of online addition as a disorder spread as parents became more watchful of the time and activities their children spent online and the emergence of ‘cyberwidows’—women whose husbands became absent due to their addiction to the internet. Joseph Walther and Larry Reid’s excerpt in the text also pokes fun at the concept of online addiction, as they compare internet addiction to their made-up disorder, acadaholism, a disease where one is addicted to academe. The text concludes the topic on online addiction with this: “If you call the internet addicting, then you have to call all powerful, evocative experience addicting.” TLT also takes a supporting stance on the internet for antisocial behavior. The text states how the internet can be “socially liberating” and the “Prozac of social communication.” I find it interesting and even a bit amusing how TLT is so one-sided and supportive of the internet, as the unit concludes with a positive description of the internet—“A great deal of what we do online today is productive, useful, and healthy.”
The online articles on Megan Meier, however, contrast dramatically with their perception of the internet. To summarize the story of Megan Meier, Megan’s friend’s mother created a Myspace account as an eighteen year old boy to first befriend, then bully the emotionally unstable Megan Meier. The constant bullying eventually caused Megan to commit suicide, and when word of this event got spread into the internet through Sarah Wells, a blogger, a cybermob outraged against the mother, whose name was Drew, ensued. This story is an extreme case of how the internet can be harmful, both for people like Megan who are socially dependant to it, and to people like Drew who eventually needed police protection from angry mobs that were spurred up by Sarah Well’s blog post. Though the internet can be “liberating,” “useful,” and “healthy,” the story of Megan Meier also shows how the internet can be harmful and destructive as well.
Discussion Questions
1. Did you think TLT’s stance on internet addiction was biased and too favorable of the internet? What is your take on internet addiction—do you think it is a real disorder?
2. In your opinion, do you think the internet is a cause to antisocial behavior or a remedy for it?
3.In connection to the last post on social cues and avatars, in what instance in the Megan Meier story do you recognize reduced social cues, avatars, or group dynamics in CMC?
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hmmm.. .A disorder can be physical or mental. Thus I suppose internet addiction can be a disorder, though there is a fine line between being sane and having a disorder. But if it can be a disorder, then what are the side effects? Are there any extremes?
I think the internet can be used to promote both anti-social and social behavior. As we know and have experienced in class- there are plenty of places to meet and converse with people online- but then again spending too much time in the chat room and less time in the real world would demote social behavior. We also use the internet on a daily basis to network with people, find clubs, parties, restaurants etc, that help promote our social lives.
Josh Evens was definitely an avatar in the Meier story. He was a front that led Megan to find him trustworthy. I can't think of any specific social cues that where present/absent in the Meier story, but I'm sure the lack of them in online communication led to Megan's frustration over her online messages. Especially through MySpace- where you don't have the simultaneous communication model as you would in instant messenger. And on top of that, with out social cues, it is difficult to determine how lightly the bullying should be taken.
It's true that Internet Addiction Disorder is not a classified addiction in the DSM. I believe the Internet is a social medium, an environment, and people cannot technically be addicted to an environment, only what the environment provides. Online gamblers are not addicted to the Internet: they are addicted to gambling, and the Internet is the medium they use. Online pornographers are not addicted to the Internet: they are addicted to pornography.
But to say that the people technically cannot be addicted to the Internet is to circumvent concerns people have about it. That's like saying that we are only concerned about people's addiction to drugs, but we don't care to stop drug dealers.
In answer to question #2:
Certainly the Internet has remedied certain antisocial tendencies in people, but if it the ONLY medium used as a training ground for social interaction, it can be a harm.
Real relationships take time and sacrifice. The Internet community offers an easy-click-away model to relationship building. Why go through the time-consuming process of meeting someone face-to-face when I can do it all from the comfort of my home?
Real relationships are built on honesty and integrity. In the Internet community, if something goes sour, you can simply delete your profile or username and start over.
Real relationships are about knowing others and being known. The Internet provides a formidable barrier of protection from being truly known.
Real relationships involve kenesics (interpreting body language, posture, touch, facial expressions, eyes and gestures) and understanding tone of voice. When someone is expressing themselves to another person, expressing their attitudes and feelings, people respond based on a number of factors. The actual words we use comprise only 7% of self-expression. The Internet trains the mind to respond not to people as they actually are, but on digital facsimiles, made up of profiles, blogs, and the best personal photos that person can muster up.
With proper parenting and other forms of social interaction, the Internet can be a fantastic tool to enhance existing relationships. However, when teens find themselves spending long hours interacting in the cyber world, for months on end, this can be the beginning of antisocial training.
Luke Gilkerson
Internet Community Manager
Covenant Eyes
www.covenanteyes.com
Post a Comment